Research report · 2026

What AI reads before it recommends.

When a buyer asks an AI assistant which software to shortlist, the answer usually comes with a list of sources. We went through more than 1.3 million of those citations, gathered over 11 months from answers about 116 B2B technology brands, to find out what the assistants read before they make a recommendation. If you're working on generative engine optimisation (GEO), or trying to work out how to get your company cited by ChatGPT, this report gives you evidence to plan with.

12 pages · PDF · Free, with no form to fill in

Or get a free snapshot for your own company →

Cover of the report What AI reads before it recommends, by Resonance, 2026
Citations
Over 1.3 million
Period
October 2025 to September 2026
Brands
116 B2B technology brands
Assistants
Eight, mostly ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity
Key findings

AI mostly reads what companies publish.

The assistants draw on company websites far more than on any other kind of source, and the pages they choose follow a pattern that marketing teams can plan around. These six findings summarise the report, and the sections below explain each one in more detail.

83%
of citations point to company websites, while media and every other kind of source share the remaining 17%.
22%
of citations go to blog posts and articles, which are the most-cited type of page overall.
6%
of citations go to a brand's own site when the question doesn't mention the brand, rising to 29% when it does.
1%
of pages earn 30% of all citations, while most of the pages in our data were cited once and never again.
+36%
more citations on average go to pages with FAQ markup, and visible dates and longer pages are linked to more citations as well.
5 months
is the typical age of a dated page when an assistant cites it, and four in ten were less than three months old.

Figures come from Resonance's analysis of Agentcy data from October 2025 to September 2026 and are rounded.

Where citations go

Most citations go to company websites.

About two-thirds of all citations go to other companies' websites, which in practice means other vendors and service firms writing about your category. Another sixth go to the brand's own site, so company websites account for more than four in every five citations in our data.

Everything outside company websites adds up to about 17%, which is a smaller share than many PR and SEO plans assume. Review sites and the press sit in that group, and they're where the assistants turn for a view from outside the vendor, so we've looked at the media side in more detail in Earned media in the age of AI answers.

66%
of citations go to other companies' websites, including competitors and the service firms that write about your category
17%
of citations go to the brand's own website, a share that grew steadily over the year
2% each
for review sites, trade media, forums, reference sites and YouTube
1% each
for national press, blogging platforms, government sources and consultancies
Page types

When buyers ask about the category, someone else writes the comparison.

Blog posts are the most-cited type of page overall. Comparison pages and best-of lists are more telling, because they earn about one in ten citations across company websites and only about one in thirty on brands' own sites. When an assistant compares you with your competitors, the page it reads has usually been written by another company in your category.

Blog posts come first

Blog posts and articles take 22% of all citations, although on brands' own sites the mix is more even, with product pages at 16% and documentation at 12% close behind the blog.

Documentation and PDFs get read

Help centres and developer documentation are cited often when buyers ask technical questions about setup, integration or security. PDFs, most of them whitepapers and reports, take about 4% of citations, provided the text inside them can be read by a machine.

Pricing pages and case studies are rare

Each takes about 1% of citations, and we suspect many are gated, vague or missing altogether. Buyers still ask about price and proof, so the assistants look for the answers on other companies' pages.

29%
of citations go to the brand's own site when the question names the brand
6%
when it doesn't, which covers the category and problem questions where shortlists form
2.5%
of the comparison and best-of pages cited on those questions sit on the brand's own site
31%
of citations go to pages that three or more different assistants cite
What cited pages have in common

Pages with FAQs and more depth get cited more often.

A small number of pages earn most of the citations, with the top 1% taking 30% of them. We audited about 190,000 cited pages to see what the most popular ones have in common, and found that pages which are easy to scan tend to do better and that longer pages with more detail do better again.

+36%
more citations on average for pages with FAQ markup, at 5.9 against 4.4 for pages without it
+26%
more citations for pages that show when they were last updated
+24%
more for pages with lists, although nine pages in ten already have them
+16%
more citations for pages that include a table
6.1 vs 3.3
average citations for pages over 5,000 words, compared with pages under 500 words
No change
from article markup on its own, and a named author makes only a small difference

We'd read these findings as the habits of well-kept pages, since sites with the budget to add FAQs and keep their dates current usually have strong content and plenty of inbound links as well. The figures are associations, and on their own they don't prove that any single feature causes more citations.

Stage and assistant

Buyers see different pages at each stage and in each assistant.

Early in the buying journey the assistants rely heavily on best-of lists, which help a buyer see who is in the market. As buyers move closer to a decision, the assistants turn to evidence such as review listings, pricing pages, case studies and PDFs. Your own site also shows up more at every step, rising from 6% of citations at the awareness stage to 20% at the decision stage.

The assistants also differ from one another in the kinds of content they choose to cite, often by a wide margin. ChatGPT draws mainly on documentation and product pages and rarely cites best-of lists or comparisons, which make up a much larger part of what Perplexity and Gemini read, alongside blog posts. Two assistants given the same question can end up building their answers from quite different pages, and that affects where you put your effort if your buyers use more than one of them.

7% → 4%
is the fall in best-of lists' share of citations from awareness to decision
1% → 2%
for case studies, and for pricing pages too, as buyers get closer to choosing
30%
of ChatGPT's citations go to documentation and product pages, against about 10% for Perplexity
14%
of Perplexity's citations go to best-of lists and comparison pages, against under 2% for ChatGPT
What to do next

How to get your pages cited by AI.

The changes below mostly come down to what you publish, how you lay it out and how often you go back to update it, and most marketing teams can make them with the people they already have.

  1. Write for the question that doesn't name you

    Category questions and “best tool for” questions are where buyers form their shortlists. On those questions your own site gets only about 6% of citations, so pages that answer them directly are where the biggest gains lie.

  2. Publish your own comparisons

    Write fair pages that compare you with named alternatives, along with pages that explain which customers you suit best. If you don't publish them, the assistants will build their comparisons from pages that other companies have written.

  3. Treat documentation as marketing

    Documentation earns about one in eight of the citations that go to brands' own sites, so keep your docs public and up to date and check that search engines and AI crawlers are able to reach them.

  4. Put the answer first

    Open each page with a direct answer to the question it targets, then support it with tables and clear headings, and show the date the page was last updated. That structure makes it easier for an assistant to quote the page accurately.

  5. Go deep on fewer pages

    Because 1% of pages take 30% of citations, one thorough reference page on your subject that you keep improving is likely to earn more than a series of thin posts on the same theme.

  6. Refresh on a schedule

    Four in ten cited pages were under three months old when an assistant picked them up, which is a good reason to review your most important pages every quarter and show the date they were last updated, so readers and assistants can both see that they are current.

  7. Make your evidence readable

    Reports locked behind a form or published as images can't be read by an assistant, so put your key findings on an open page as text as well.

  8. Earn the pages you can't write

    Review sites and trade media fill the gaps between vendor pages. You can only appear on them through reviews and press coverage, which in most companies is work led by the PR team.

The full report

Read it in full.

The report runs to twelve pages and covers where citations go and which types of page get cited at each stage and by each assistant. It also looks at what the most-cited pages have in common and how the picture changed over the year, and it's free to download without filling in a form.

Download the PDF
Pages
12
Format
PDF, 1 MB
Data
Oct 2025 to Sep 2026
Inside the report
Report page: share of AI citations by type of page, led by blog posts and articles
Which types of page the assistants read most
Report page: page types cited on brands' own websites compared with all company websites
How your own site compares with everyone else's
Report page: average citations per page with and without FAQs, dates, lists and tables, and by length
How structure and depth relate to citations

Try it with an AI assistant by asking what these findings mean for your own website and content.

Key statistics

AI citation statistics for 2026.

These headline numbers from the report are rounded for quoting and all come from over 1.3 million citations in answers to buyer questions about 116 B2B technology brands between October 2025 and September 2026.

  • 83%of AI citations point to company websites: 66% to other companies' sites and 17% to the brand's own.
  • 22%of citations go to blog posts and articles, well ahead of product pages at 9% and documentation at 8%.
  • 6%of citations go to a brand's own site when the question doesn't name the brand, rising to 29% when it does.
  • 2.5%of the comparison and best-of pages cited on unbranded questions are on the brand's own site.
  • 30%of all citations go to just 1% of cited pages, and 58% of pages are cited only once.
  • +36%more citations on average go to pages with FAQ markup, and pages showing an updated date get 26% more.
  • 6.1 vs 3.3average citations for pages over 5,000 words, against pages under 500 words.
  • 5 monthsis the typical age of a dated page when AI cites it, and 39% are under three months old.
  • 1% → 5%comparison pages' share of AI citations, from October 2025 to September 2026.
  • 8% → 21%the brand's own site's share of citations, late 2025 to the third quarter of 2026.

For a shorter and more practical version of these findings, our blog post How to rank in ChatGPT turns them into a step-by-step guide you can apply to your own website.

If you're citing this research, you're welcome to use these figures as long as you credit and link to the source, which is Resonance (2026), What AI reads before it recommends. https://www.resonancecrowd.com/research/what-ai-reads-before-it-recommends

Questions

Questions about AI citations.

What content do AI assistants cite most when B2B buyers ask for advice?

AI assistants cite company websites far more than any other kind of source. In Resonance's analysis of over 1.3 million citations in AI answers about 116 B2B technology brands, about 83% pointed to company websites, with two-thirds going to other companies' sites and a sixth to the brand's own. Blog posts and articles were the most-cited type of page at 22% of citations, well ahead of product pages and documentation.

How often do AI assistants cite a company's own website?

About 17% of the citations in our data went to the brand's own site, although the share depends heavily on how the question is worded. It rises to 29% when the question names the brand and falls to 6% when it doesn't, which means your site plays a small part in the category questions where buyers form their shortlists. The own-site share grew over the year, from about 8% of citations in late 2025 to 21% by the third quarter of 2026.

Does FAQ schema help a page get cited by AI?

Pages with FAQ markup were cited 36% more often on average than pages without it, which was the largest gain linked to any single feature in our audit. Pages with a visible updated date were cited 26% more, and pages with lists 24% more, while tables were linked to a smaller gain of 16%. These are associations that don't prove cause, because well-resourced sites tend to do all of these things and usually have stronger content and more links as well.

Do longer pages get cited more often by AI?

Longer pages were cited more often in our data, and the gap between the shortest and the longest pages was wide. Pages over 5,000 words averaged about six citations each, compared with about three for pages under 500 words. The most-cited 10% of pages had a median length of about 1,700 words and used more headings than pages that were cited only once.

How recent are the pages AI assistants cite?

Among pages with a detectable publish date, the typical page was about five months old when an assistant cited it. Four in ten were under three months old and three in four were under a year old. News goes stale fastest of all the sources we looked at, with technology news usually cited within about 18 days of publication. Trade features and company pages, by comparison, stayed in use for months.

Which third-party sites do AI assistants cite for B2B technology?

Beyond company websites, the assistants cite review sites such as G2, Capterra and PeerSpot, forums such as Reddit and Hacker News, reference sources such as Wikipedia and arXiv, and YouTube. They also cite blogging platforms such as Medium and Substack, along with news and trade media, and together these sources make up about 17% of citations. Each assistant has its own mix, with Gemini and Perplexity citing YouTube and Reddit far more often than ChatGPT, which hardly cites video at all.

Do different AI assistants cite different types of content?

They do, and the differences are large enough to change which of your pages get read. ChatGPT leans on documentation, which makes up 16% of its citations, and on product pages at 14%, and it rarely cites best-of lists or comparison pages. Perplexity gives 29% of its citations to blog posts and about one in seven to best-of lists and comparison pages combined, and both Perplexity and Gemini cite YouTube and Reddit far more often than ChatGPT does.

How do I get my content cited by ChatGPT?

Publish pages that answer the questions buyers ask, especially the category questions that don't mention you by name. In our analysis of over 1.3 million AI citations, the most-cited pages put the answer first and went into real depth, and they were more likely to use FAQs and tables and to show an updated date. It also helps to publish fair comparison pages yourself and to refresh key pages every quarter. Coverage on the review sites and trade media that AI reads supports all of this, because those are the pages you can't write yourself.

What are the ranking factors for AI search?

No assistant publishes a list of ranking factors, although the pages AI cites most do share some clear patterns. In our data, pages with FAQ markup averaged 36% more citations and pages with a visible updated date averaged 26% more. Lists and tables were linked to smaller gains, while longer pages were cited more often and most of the pages the assistants cited were under a year old. These are associations that don't prove cause, so we'd treat them as the habits of well-kept pages.

What is generative engine optimisation (GEO)?

Generative engine optimisation, sometimes called answer engine optimisation (AEO) or LLM SEO, is the work of getting your brand and content cited in answers from AI assistants such as ChatGPT and Google's AI Overviews. It overlaps with SEO, although it depends more on third-party sources, clear answers and content that the assistants can quote directly. Our research shows which sources the assistants actually cite when buyers ask about B2B technology.

How was the research done?

Agentcy, Resonance's AI visibility platform, asked eight AI assistants, including ChatGPT and Gemini, the kinds of questions B2B buyers ask, and recorded every source they cited. The data covers almost 190,000 answers to about 67,000 questions asked between October 2025 and September 2026. We sorted the cited sites and pages by type and audited about 190,000 cited pages for features such as FAQs, tables, visible dates and length.

Free AI visibility snapshot

See which pages AI reads for your category.

Tell us who you are and we'll ask ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity the questions your buyers ask, then send you a short snapshot of what they say and which pages they cite.

  • Which pages AI cites for your category, yours and your competitors'
  • How often you're recommended, and for which questions
  • The three changes we'd make first to your site and content

It's free and comes with no obligation, and we run it with Agentcy, the platform behind this research.

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy.